{"id":696,"date":"2009-04-24T13:49:01","date_gmt":"2009-04-24T18:49:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rationalitynow.com\/blog\/?p=696"},"modified":"2009-04-24T13:49:01","modified_gmt":"2009-04-24T18:49:01","slug":"creationism-intelligent-design-not-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.rationalitynow.com\/blog\/2009\/04\/24\/creationism-intelligent-design-not-science\/","title":{"rendered":"Creationism = Intelligent Design = Not Science"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"ManI’ve done a lot of reading recently about Evolution and Intelligent Design (Creationism) and really, the arguments for Intelligent Design, whether they’re being put forth by unqualified supporters in Texas<\/a> or by biologists like Michael Behe<\/a>, are all non-starters. ID supporters have yet to come up with any evidence to support their theory. Their arguments consist solely of attempts to cast doubt upon the scientifically supported theory of evolution, attempts which always fail, but sadly seem to take hold of those who really have no knowledge of evolutionary theory or the evidence that supports it.<\/p>\n

I was delighted to find this article<\/a> at Evaluating Christianity<\/a> about the nonsense put forth by Young Earth Creationists. It’s witty and insightful and definitely worth taking the time to read.<\/p>\n

Here are some highlights. I’ll quote this bit for starters.<\/p>\n

If creationists are correct, then not only do we need to scrap all of biology, but we need to throw out everything we think we know about archaeology, anthropology, astronomy, geology (no plate tectonics!), chemistry and physics (since radiometric dating is supposedly unreliable), and probably a few dozen other scientific disciplines. Think about that for a minute. If young-earth creationism is correct, then every single scientist in any of these fields of study is either an idiot or a fraud.<\/p>\n

If you find that hard to swallow, you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re not alone.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I find it interesting that, of the Young Earth Creationists that I know (only a few), none of them reject science out of hand. I don’t think any of them deny that the Earth revolves around the Sun or that the Earth has shifting plates that cause earthquakes when they change position or many other science’y ideas. They seem to, out of necessity to support their views, only deny the science that contradicts their bibles. It’s “pick and choose” science… somewhat like “pick and choose” biblical religion, it would seem.<\/p>\n

Anyway… here’s my favorite part because it really hits the nail on the head with regard to arguments about evolution and science.<\/p>\n

This is why I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t take creationism seriously. Not because I \u00e2\u20ac\u0153reject the Bible\u00e2\u20ac\u009d or \u00e2\u20ac\u0153have differing views of the evidence,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d or whatever. I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t take it seriously because the people who are qualified to weigh in on these claims \u00e2\u20ac\u201d people of varying backgrounds, races, religious and political beliefs \u00e2\u20ac\u201d have done so and reject your claims.<\/p>\n

I imagine that some (like longtime EC commenter Nathaniel) may try to draw the same analogy to Biblical historians versus Jesus-mythers. But here\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s the main difference: by their own admission, 30% of Biblical historians concede that there was no empty tomb. If 30% of biologists denied common ancestry, or 30% of astronomers thought that the stars were 6,000 years old, then we would indeed have a real controversy and those ideas should be engaged on their merits.<\/p>\n

For example: a small minority of paleontologists, led by Jack Horner, contend that T.rex was a scavenger rather than an apex predator. This is a highly contested hypothesis and is subscribed to by only a tiny minority of palentologists \u00e2\u20ac\u201d but it is, nevertheless, a respectable scientific dispute.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It’s a simple and clear explanation of why some disputes are valid and others are really not (check out the rest of the article for context and additional arguments).<\/p>\n

If you’re going to make attempts to refute scientific theories, then you’d better have a scientific argument. Creationists don’t have one, and never will, because the basis of their entire position is thoroughly unscientific. You can’t propose “it was magic” as your explanation and expect to be taken seriously.<\/p>\n

Not even by magicians.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I’ve done a lot of reading recently about Evolution and Intelligent Design (Creationism) and really, the arguments for Intelligent Design, whether they’re being put forth by unqualified supporters in Texas or by biologists like Michael Behe, are all non-starters. ID supporters have yet to come up with any evidence to support their theory. Their arguments … <\/p>\n

Continue reading “Creationism = Intelligent Design = Not Science”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,21],"tags":[182,226,309,311,442,494,721,786],"class_list":["post-696","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-evolution","category-science","tag-christianity","tag-creationism","tag-evidence","tag-evolution","tag-intelligent-design","tag-magic","tag-science","tag-texas","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.rationalitynow.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/696","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.rationalitynow.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.rationalitynow.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.rationalitynow.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.rationalitynow.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=696"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.rationalitynow.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/696\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.rationalitynow.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=696"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.rationalitynow.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=696"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.rationalitynow.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=696"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}