Representative Mike Pence (R-Ind.) spoke to Chris Matthews in defense of Republicans, saying that his party is not anti-science and that this whole “anti-science thing is a little bit weak.”
That, in and of itself, would not be particularly noteworthy. However, in the same interview, Pence goes on to show that he, himself, is quite anti-science… which seems, to me, to somewhat negate his credibility in defending the Republicans on science issues.
When asked if he believed in evolution, Pence replied…
I embrace the view that God created the heavens and the earth, the seas and all that’s in them…the means that he used to do that, I can’t say.
He also expressed skepticism about the science surrounding global warming.
From an article on Politico…
On global warming, Pence said that Republicans are “more than willing to stand for clean air,†but added that “in the mainstream media there is a denial about the growing skepticism about global warming.â€
I find the claim of a “growing skepticism” to be interesting. If the skepticism is growing, it’s definitely not among scientists with knowledge in relevant fields of study.
Then Pence drops this bit of joy.
“What is science but an exploration?†Pence asked. “Science is an explanation of demonstrable facts, isn’t it?â€
I suppose, as a very simple summary, that’s true. However, it’s not particularly accurate. For instance, creationism (and ID), despite providing an “explanation of demonstrable facts” is not science. Science depends on a method, a series of steps, without which you have no science. If you bypass the steps, as does creationism, you can’t claim to be scientific. Pence, in that one quote alone, shows that he really doesn’t get science.
Here’s the video of the full interview (or at least a large part). It’s kind of painful to watch. Matthews keeps pushing the question about evolution, but Pence refuses to give any answer other than his “God created the heavens and earth” answer. Pence also makes the claim that Democrats put ideology over science regarding stem cell policy (?!?). It’s a lot of dancing around the questions on Pence’s part.
He also intimates that schools should be teaching creationism alongside evolution, but doesn’t say it outright.
So on one hand, Pence says the Republican party is not anti-science, but then on the other, his answers show him to be unequivocally anti-science.
Is that irony or hypocrisy?
That is deliciously ironic hypocrisy.